Found
here. Our comments in bold.
----------------
Over 1200 words, yet Ms. Prata cannot bring herself to explain why (from the Bible) contemporary prophecy is unbiblical.
So that the reader would understand, Mr. Prata, like a lot of cessationists, falsely believes that everything God says must be included in the Bible. The Bible doesn't tell us this, but that's what she believes.
Towards the end of her article she writes,
The canon is closed.
We certainly agree. But what does the closed canon have to do with contemporary prophecy? She continues:
God’s new revelation ended with Revelation 22.
"New revelation" for her means anything God says after the closed canon, all of which must be put in the Bible. However, there is no biblical standard that requires this. Next:
I’m not saying God CAN’T speak now, of course He can. It’s just that He closed the Bible with a warning not to add to the book nor take away from it.
Again we find her premise that God speaking is synonymous with adding words to the Bible. And finally:
He said that at the present time, He would not be speaking.
Thus her unbiblical conclusion based on a false premise.
The Bible tells us that God is still speaking today:
He. 1:3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.
We have written detailed explanations about contemporary prophecy and the closed canon, here and here. --------------------