Disclaimer: Some postings contain other author's material. All such material is used here for fair use and discussion purposes.

Showing posts with label lesley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lesley. Show all posts

Monday, August 3, 2026

The mailbag: potpourri (Women sharing the gospel) - Michelle Lesley

Excerpted from here. Our comments in bold.
-----------------

Ms. Lesley has a penchant for analyzing what Christian women can and cannot do. She has created an endless series of micro-doctrines regarding women's roles in the church, all based on a faulty interpretation of 1 Timothy 2:12: 

I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 

But she will never quote this or any Bible verse. Because of this we must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.

We discuss the issues of women and leadership here.
-----------------------

Friday, July 3, 2026

Revival: In America We Trust? -by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------------

Ms. Lesley doesn't like the idea of a revival so far-reaching that it transforms the very fabric of society. Why? Because there's nothing worse than to be called a "Christian Nationalist." She thinks that the belief amounts to idolizing the country. 

For her, real revival excludes this possibility. The line she draws is Arbitrary, however, because she doesn't make her case from the Bible. In fact, it is entirely missing.

How can someone teach doctrine without the Bible?

At least she believes in revival in some form. Nevertheless, we must deem this Bad Bible Teaching. 
----------------------

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Recommend a Church - by Michelle Lesley If you’re searching for a new church

Found here. Our comments in bold.
----------------------------

Those who have "discernment ministries' (actually, these are not actual ministries, they are mostly a single individual with a blog and a sour disposition) have a tendency to find heresy under every rock. They have severe and exacting standards, and anyone that violates a single jot or tittle from their micro doctrines is cast into the outer darkness. We have deemed these folks the doctrinal police.

Ms. Lesley has been bestowed this honor more than once in our blog, so much so that we have awarded her her own tag.

Today we are posting Ms. Lesley's standards for being able to recommend a church. Astonishingly, there are 14 requirements, some of which exclude entire denominations. Remember, these are the criteria for her to be able to recommend a local church. 

Ms. Lesley doesn't quote a single word of Scripture. We must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
-----------------------------

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Sinners and False Teachers: The Women Who “Pastor” and Preach - Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------------------------

Ms. Lesley has written numerous articles about the role of women in the church, parsing and creating micro-doctrines about every conceivable activity a woman might engage in. This is all based on a misunderstanding of a single verse: 

1 Tim. 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.

We should say that Ms. Lesley's interpretation of this verse, i.e., that women can't preach or be pastors, is widely held. However, even a widely-held belief isn't necessarily a biblically correct belief.

Before we consider her position, we need to establish the biblical fact that the church is not presided over by a pastor, it is led by a team of men called elders: 
1Pe. 5:1-2 To the elders among you, I appeal as a fellow-elder, a witness of Christ’s sufferings and one who also will share in the glory to be revealed: 2 Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, serving as overseers...
Here we find Peter exhorting the elders of this church to be shepherds and overseers. That is, elders need to step up to be more than just elders, they need to pastor and oversee.

Paul instructed Timothy about elder leadership in the very same letter cited by Ms. Lesley:
1Ti. 5:17 The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.
Paul is very clear. There are (or should be) elders who run the church, and those elders that preach (share the Gospel) and teach (instruct the church) are worthy of greater honor. Again, there is no mention of a singular man in charge here.

There is no Bible verse that tells us that pastors lead churches. There's no verse that tells us pastors preach. There's not even a Bible verse that tells us that pastors are part of the eldership.

Elders govern the church, not a pastor.

From the belief that pastors run churches comes the idea that preaching the sermon is exercising authority. We can start to see the "chain of evidence" here. Because the pastor is in charge, and he preaches the sermon, the preaching itself is an expression of the pastor's leadership. And since women cannot teach or be in authority over men, a woman can't be a pastor or preach a sermon.

It all seems to make sense until we gain clarity about how a church is biblically governed. 

Now with that clarity, let's consider the verse. Let's quote it again:

1 Tim. 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.

The first thing we wish to note is that Paul was not not telling Timothy about what happens in the church service. This should be obvious if we are able to remove the veil and simply accept the biblical narrative. Let's quote the whole chapter. As we read, the questions we then should ask are, 

  • Should prayers and intercession be made only in church?
  • Should we lead tranquil lives only when in church?
  • Should men pray with lifted hands only in church?
  • Should women dress modestly only in church?
  • Should women do good deeds only in church?

This is the ASV:

1I exhort therefore, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions, thanksgivings, be made for all men; 2for kings and all that are in high place; that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and gravity. 3This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4who would have all men to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth. 5For there is one God, one mediator also between God and men, himself man, Christ Jesus, 6who gave himself a ransom for all; the testimony to be borne in its own times; 7whereunto I was appointed a preacher and an apostle (I speak the truth, I lie not), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth.

8I desire therefore that the men pray in every place, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and disputing.

9In like manner, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefastness and sobriety; not with braided hair, and gold or pearls or costly raiment; 10but (which becometh women professing godliness) through good works. 11Let a woman learn in quietness with all subjection. 12But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness. 13For Adam was first formed, then Eve; 14and Adam was not beguiled, but the woman being beguiled hath fallen into transgression: 15but she shall be saved through her child-bearing, if they continue in faith and love and sanctification with sobriety.
The answers to our questions are obviously no. But for some reason we think Paul was discussing church order throughout this passage. This is not the case.

Why?

First, Paul was not telling us about what women can do, but rather, "a woman." The Greek word is singular. A woman
  • should learn in quietness and submission
  • cannot teach
  • cannot have authority
  • over "a man" (Also singular)
  • must be silent
"A woman" cannot do these things regarding "a man." This is most certainly not a church service. More likely with think, Paul was discussing marriage. "A woman" is also translated "a wife," and "a man" is also translated "a husband."

We find an example of this right in text:
14and Adam was not beguiled, but the woman being beguiled hath fallen into transgression...
We know that "the woman" was Eve, Adam's wife. The same Greek word is found here:

Mt. 5:31 “It has been said, `Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’

So depending on the context, the word can easily go either way. 

Second, "a man" works the same way. The Greek word for man/husband is found here: 

Mk. 10:2 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?”

Obviously the word "man" is referring to a husband.

Ok, let's apply our knowledge to the verse and create a perfectly justifiable retranslation:

1 Tim. 2:12 I do not permit a wife to teach or to have authority over [her] husband; she must be silent. 
 
The reason Paul gave for her to do this? Not to ensure a church service is conducted properly. His reason is the prototypical marriage, Adam and Eve:
1Ti. 2:13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve.
This simplifies the whole scenario and dare we say puts an end to the dispute over these verses.

So what can "a woman" do or not do in church? 

She cannot be an elder or lead the church, which is reserved for men:

Tit. 1:6 An elder must be blameless, the husband of but one wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient.

So if she is not among those who govern the church, everything else is available for qualified women: 

  • She can teach men, since teaching men is not exercising authority over her husband or leading the church
  • She can be a pastor, since the pastor position is not exercising authority over her husband or leading the church
  • She can lead ministries, since leading ministries is not exercising authority over her husband or leading the church
  • She can speak from the pulpit, since speaking from the pulpit is not exercising authority over her husband or leading the church
We recognize that these assertions might be a stretch for some, but our appeal is from the Bible and not tradition. We hope this expands the reader's understanding.

So, Ms. Lesley's presentation is all based on false premises. Read on.
---------------------------

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

When God Answers the “Wrong” Prayer - Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
---------------------

We have had much to complain about in our blog when it comes to Ms. Lesley, so much so that we awarded her a label. For example, she obsesses over 1 Timothy 2:11 and what a woman is allowed to do and not do. She's developed a substantial list of do's and don'ts from this Scripture, almost all of which is based on a false idea.

This is what characterizes a lot of her teaching, false ideas. 

But today, we celebrate her for a comprehensive and accurate teaching about prayer. With one small caveat (which we will note below), we are pleased to be able to acknowledge that Ms. Lesley is capable of truly excellent work.
------------------------------

Friday, February 27, 2026

Top 10 NAR* and Seeker-Driven Buzzwords - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------------

Today Ms. Lesley is taking issue with jargon used by certain people, suggesting that this jargon is an indicator of heresy. However, all Christians use jargon. It's just that Ms. Lesley doesn't like these people for their jargon because she doesn't like their doctrines. It's really a superficial and trite reason, grounded in a pre-existent dislike.

We don't intend to defend any of these people she cites, we are only interested in evaluating Ms. Lesley's presentation. 

She doesn't explain anything. She offers no analysis. She provides no teaching. She quotes no Bible verse. She doesn't tell us anything about what's wrong with these phrases, most of which are found in the Bible in some form or another.

We must deem the Bad Bible Teaching.
---------------------------------

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

The Mailbag: Communion Questions - by Michelle Lesley

Excerpted from here. Our comments in bold.
------------------------

Ms. Lesley didn't write this article to explain the Bible, she's here to explain her tradition and church practice. Her objective is to further parse what women are allowed to do in a church service. This is a frequent practice of Ms. Lesley, to micro-analyze gender roles to make sure women keep their place, all based on 

1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.

The problem is, the NT does not contain a solemn communion ritual. There is no biblical indication that communion can only happen in a church building on Sunday. Rather, communion was the church gathering for a meal and fellowship. 

Whenever they got together to eat, they were to remember the Blood [1Co. 11:25] and the Body [1Co. 11:24], and especially, to not dishonor its members [1Co. 11:22]. This was the regular fellowship meal, not a solemn, solitary ceremony with a little plastic cup of juice and a cracker.

Partaking of a meal together speaks to being one body. The sharing of bread is symbolic of togetherness, unity, and a singular identity. Eating together means we belong together as the family.

Communion is the interaction of the body of Christ one with another in honor when it gathers together to eat. To dishonor the body (the church) is to dishonor Christ. However, the Corinthian church was despising the Body (that is, certain members of the church, and by extension, Jesus' sacrifice) by neglecting some, eating all the food, and by getting drunk.

If we don't recognize the Body we eat and drink judgment upon ourselves. If we eat and exclude, diminish, or dishonor our brothers and sisters, we tear down the Body. It isn't about considering the state of our own souls in relation to unconfessed sin, it is instead about our regard for both Jesus' sacrifice and our care and honor for the Body.

It seems clear that communion is more accurately represented by a church potluck than by the little cracker and splash of grape juice during a solemn church service. Communion speaks of a much higher purpose for the church than is currently practiced, a togetherness and unity of vision and purpose that far exceeds the ritual. 

Why is this important? Because if communion is only a church ritual, then who "administers" it becomes an issue, and also where it happens is important. So if communion can only be done by a pastor in a church service, that gives Ms. Lesley the opportunity to bring in her ideas about what women can and can't do. 

And this is the crux of the question. Ms. Lesley wants to add another sub-doctrine to 1 Timothy 2:12. We must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
-------------------------

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Tara Leigh Cobble, The Bible Recap, & D-Group - by Michelle Lesley

Excerpted from here. Our comments in bold.
---------------------------

Ms. Lesley has appeared in our blog dozens of times, mostly for micro-dissecting 1 Timothy 2:11. When she is not examining every little detail about what women can and cannot do regarding church, she is one of the Doctrinal Police, continually scouting the spiritual horizon for heretics.

We at first thought she was a harmless, though mistaken, Bible teacher. However, we have come to the conclusion that she is not harmless. She is either unable or unwilling to honestly teach the Bible, preferring to interpret it via her doctrine, rather than obtain her doctrine from it.

Today she is evaluating the podcasts of someone named Tara Leigh Cobble, looking for instances of her not toeing the proper doctrinal line. She apparently found a problem, in Ms. Cobble's 8th episode.
-------------------------

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

What is the New Apostolic Reformation? part two - by Michelle Lesley

Part one is found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------

We continue our slog through this supposed explanation of what the NAR is. Ms. Lesley does manage to quote a few Scriptures in this half of her presentation, but add little light to the matter. She goes on and on about the NAR, leveling charge after accusation, never documenting a single one.

To add insult to injury, Ms. Lesley is unable (or unwilling) to teach what she considers to be the correct Biblical view. 
--------------------

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

What is the New Apostolic Reformation? part one - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
------------------------

Part one of two.

The NAR is Ms. Lesley's boogie man. They are evil, heretical, and deceptive. She's deathly afraid that people will be drawn in unawares. So she's here to warn us of the dangers about what they believe, but she is unable quote a single primary source.

And in part one of this long article she only manages to quote a single Bible verse and snippets of three others. That's it.

We must consider this Bad Bible Teaching. 

We should mention, we are not here to defend the NAR, but rather to examine Ms. Lesley's flawed presentation. 
--‐--‐------‐---

Thursday, July 10, 2025

The Mailbag: Is it biblical for women to carry out The Great Commission? - by Michelle Lesley

Excerpted from here. Our comments in bold.
--------------------

It hasn't been that long since Ms. Lesley last appeared in our blog. As is typical, she seems unusually preoccupied with parsing, subdividing, and micro-analyzing 1 Timothy 2:12. However, in the below excerpt she doesn't quote it. In fact, she doesn't quote any Scriptures at all. 

We must consider this Bad Bible Teaching.

We shall quote it: 
1Ti. 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
From these nineteen words Ms. Lesley has in the past provided excruciating analyses about what a woman can or cannot do: Read the announcements in church, sing in the choir, teach Sunday school, give pro-life talks in church, administer communion, be a deacon (ess), teach the children's sermon during the service, and, teach the Bible in a nursing home. All this based on a single misinterpreted verse.

So, continuing in this vein she now wants to explain if women can evangelize or baptize. As mentioned, her explanation will not explain any Scripture. In fact, she will provide no evidence or documentation at all, nothing but bare assertions.
------------------

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Soul ties? - Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
---------------------

Ms. Lesley is asked a question about soul ties and completely drops the ball in her answer. And she doesn't quote a single Bible verse. 

We must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
----------------------------

Friday, June 20, 2025

What Must I Do to Be Saved? - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
---------------------

We were filled with hearty amens as we read Ms. Lesley's explanation of the Gospel. Until close to the end, where she writes two erroneous things. The first, 

The gift God offers you is that, on the cross, Christ took the punishment you deserve for your sin.

This is a false and pernicious statement. There is no Bible verse that says Jesus substituted for us. None. Nor did the Father did not punish Jesus. Ever. To state otherwise is to completely misunderstand (or misrepresent) Jesus' sacrificial death. 
There isn't a single verse in the Bible that tells us the Father punished Jesus or poured out His wrath on Him. Not one. Check it yourself, dear reader.

The first thing we need to note is typology. The OT sacrifice is a type (or illustration) of a greater truth, Jesus' one sufficient sacrifice.

It is important to note the OT animals:
  • were not tortured to satisfy the priest
  • were never imputed with the sacrificer's sin
  • did not receive God's wrath
  • were not regarded as substitutes
Similarly,
  • Jesus was not tortured to satisfy the Father
  • Jesus was not imputed with our sin 
  • Jesus did not receive God's wrath
  • Jesus did not substitute Himself in our place
Jesus carried (Greek: anapheró), He took, He bore away our sin as a burden to the cross:

He. 9:28: ...so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.

He didn't "bear" our sin as in "bear" our punishment, He carried it away. He was sacrificed, not sacrificed and then punished. 

His work is described in the Bible as the propitiation for our sin: 

Hebrews 2:17 Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.

"Propitiation" is the Greek word hilaskomai, which means appeasement/satisfaction of divine wrath on sin") – properly, to extend propitiation, showing mercy by satisfying (literally, propitiating) the wrath of God on sin; "to conciliate, appease, propitiate... 

Jesus's death on the cross, His spilled blood, is the effective agent in His propitiation:
Col. 1:19-20 For God was pleased to have all his fulness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.
So Jesus by spilling His blood appeased the wrath of God, turning away what God was going to do in righteous judgment to sinners. By the spilled blood the Father was completely satisfied. Jesus' work was sufficient and totally efficacious. Any man who comes under the blood finds that the Father's wrath against him has been appeased.

The blood is enough. Nothing else. Period. Including the punishment of Jesus. 

If God's wrath against the sinner is totally appeased by Jesus' blood when he repents, why do some think that His wrath must be poured out somewhere else, i.e., on Jesus? This is the crucial question, and why we began with our assertion that the Father did not punish Jesus for our sin.

Read this carefully: If the Father punished Jesus for our sin, then He didn't forgive at all, He simply redirected his wrath and carried it out anyway.

The second glaringly false statement made by Ms. Lesley:

The way you receive that gift and have Christ’s righteousness “credited to your account” is to repent from (have the heart desire to turn away from and ask God’s forgiveness for) your sin and trust that Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection paid the penalty for your sin.

Jesus did not pay the penalty for our sins, He paid for us:
1Co. 6:19-20 You are not your own; 20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body. 
1Co. 7:23 You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men.
In fact, we were condemned to death already:
Ro. 5:16 Again, the gift of God is not like the result of the one man’s sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification. 
Jn. 3:18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already...
This means Jesus paid no penalty for our sin, rather, His death and resurrection propitiated for our sin and brought us from death to life, lifting our condemnation: 
Ro. 8:1-2 Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, 2 because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death.
Ms. Lesley must not be allowed to misrepresent any part of the Gospel, especially regarding the nature and character of God.
-----------------------

Wednesday, January 8, 2025

The Mailbag: “I Speak Jesus,” Charity Gayle, and How to Vet Christian Music - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
-----------------------

Ms. Lesley takes great offense at this song because it focuses on the speaking the name of Jesus. She errantly assumes that the songwriters ("NAR," don' cha know) are using Jesus' name as a magical incantation of sorts.

It is clear Ms. Lesley has never considered the Name of Jesus as Scripture presents it. Because of her doctrinal biases it's not a teaching she's acquainted with, though the Bible talks about the Name of Jesus and its importance and preeminence repeatedly. She reacts to a Scriptural idea that is new to her by plugging her ears and screaming "heresy!" 

Ms. Lesley asks some questions she thinks cannot be satisfactorily answered. We shall do so.
  • What do you mean by that?
To "speak Jesus" is when those who are "in Christ" [Gal. 3:26] appeal to and use His name and authority, particularly in prayer.
  • Where, in context and rightly handled, does the Bible teach us to do that?
Ac. 3:16 By faith in the name of Jesus, this man whom you see and know was made strong. It is Jesus’ name and the faith that comes through him that has given this complete healing to him, as you can all see.

Ac. 2:38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 
 
Col. 3:17 And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.
 
1Co. 1:10 I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another...
 
Ac. 4:10 then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed.
 
Ja. 5:14 Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord.
 
Ep. 5:20 always giving thanks to God the Father for everything, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
 
Ac. 16:18 She kept this up for many days. Finally Paul became so troubled that he turned round and said to the spirit, “In the name of Jesus Christ I command you to come out of her!” At that moment the spirit left her.

Ph. 2:9-10 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth...

Ac. 4:30 Stretch out your hand to heal and perform miraculous signs and wonders through the name of your holy servant Jesus.” 
 
Rom. 10:13 for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” [Joel 2:32]
  • What is that supposed to accomplish, or what will the result of that be so I can watch for it?
See above Scriptures for examples.

The name of Jesus is powerful when used by those who belong to him, and dangerous to those who do not [Acts 19:11-19].
--------------------------

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

"Eat the meat and spit out the bones" meme

 Found on some Calvinist/reformist website somewhere:


It seems like a doctrinally sound teacher is simply a teacher the Michelle Lesley likes. Or maybe it's a sliding scale. A teacher can get one or two things wrong and that's fine. Maybe that's a "rounding error" for the 100% standard. So how much error is too much? Unknown. 

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

The Mailbag: Potpourri (Female Bible authors?…) - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------------

Ms. Lesley continues her series of articles regarding her view of women's roles in the church. She has developed many micro doctrines concerning what women can and cannot do in church. Most of these are derived from a faulty view of 1 Timothy 2:12. Her presentations are sometimes so egregious that we have reserved a corner of our blog for her.

Today she claims that no woman wrote Scripture. We shall examine this claim.

As we consider this we first should note that no title of any book in the Bible identifies a woman as the author. But these titles, like the chapter and verse division, are not part of the original text, they were added later and should not be regarded as inspired.

Second, the inspired author is sometimes a matter of speculation (Ruth, Esther, and Hebrews for example). 

Third, 
we don't know who actually wrote down the words of Bible. The person who put quill to papyrus may have simply been a scribe, or may indeed have been the Holy Spirit-inspired person named in the title. We know Paul did not autograph at least some of his epistles. It is generally recognized that he dictated many of his letters via amanuenses. He writes:
Ga. 6:11 See what large letters I use as I write to you with my own hand!
This clearly implies that he wanted to emphasize his point by writing these words himself.

In addition, Paul probably dictated many of his letters to Timothy:
  • 2Co. 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy...
  • Ph. 1:1 Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, To all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi...
  • Col. 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother...
  • 1Th. 1:1 Paul, Silas, and Timothy...
  • 2Th. 1:1 Paul, Silas, and Timothy...
  • Phile. 1 Paul, a prisoner of Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother, To Philemon...
Having armed ourselves with the knowledge that the Bible is completely inspired and trustworthy, yet autographed by a variety people, known and unknown, we shall now consider the matter at hand.

We are puzzled by those who would assert that no women "wrote" the Bible, for even the casual reader would discover that it is simply not true. To believe women contributed nothing to the Holy Writ would be to errantly omit important portions of Scripture where inspired women of God spoke His Word, both in the OT and the NT.

Women spoke inspired words, regardless of who wrote them down. The one who spoke the inspired words must be considered primary over the one who wrote those words.

Lastly, we would assert it to be of marginal importance to know whose hand actually wrote the words which became our Bible. In any case, it would be improper to conclude that only men wrote the Bible.

Here's a survey of women who uttered God's words: 

The Old Testament

1Sa. 2:1-10  

Hannah articulated the very words of God:
1Sa. 2:1-10 Then Hannah prayed and said: “My heart rejoices in the LORD; in the LORD my horn is lifted high. My mouth boasts over my enemies, for I delight in your deliverance. 1Sa. 2:2 “There is no-one holy like the LORD; there is no-one besides you; there is no Rock like our God. 3 “Do not keep talking so proudly or let your mouth speak such arrogance, for the LORD is a God who knows, and by him deeds are weighed. 4 “The bows of the warriors are broken, but those who stumbled are armed with strength. 5 Those who were full hire themselves out for food, but those who were hungry hunger no more. She who was barren has borne seven children, but she who has had many sons pines away. 6 “The LORD brings death and makes alive; he brings down to the grave and raises up. 7 The LORD sends poverty and wealth; he humbles and he exalts. 8 He raises the poor from the dust and lifts the needy from the ash heap; he seats them with princes and has them inherit a throne of honor. “For the foundations of the earth are the LORD’s; upon them he has set the world. 9 He will guard the feet of his saints, but the wicked will be silenced in darkness. “It is not by strength that one prevails; 10 those who oppose the LORD will be shattered. He will thunder against them from heaven; the LORD will judge the ends of the earth. “He will give strength to his king and exalt the horn of his anointed.” 
Judges 5:1-9

Deborah's prophetic psalm, never before uttered.
1 On that day Deborah and Barak son of Abinoam sang this song: 2 When the princes in Israel take the lead, when the people willingly offer themselves — praise the LORD! 3 “Hear this, you kings! Listen, you rulers! I will sing to the LORD, I will sing; I will make music to the LORD, the God of Israel. 4 O LORD, when you went out from Seir, when you marched from the land of Edom, the earth shook, the heavens poured, the clouds poured down water. 5 The mountains quaked before the LORD, the One of Sinai, before the LORD, the God of Israel. 6 In the days of Shamgar son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the roads were abandoned; travelers took to winding paths. 7 Village life in Israel ceased, ceased until I, Deborah, arose, arose a mother in Israel. 8 When they chose new gods, war came to the city gates, and not a shield or spear was seen among forty thousand in Israel. 9 My heart is with Israel’s princes, with the willing volunteers among the people. Praise the LORD!
2Kg. 22:15-20

Huldah spoke a prophetic word:
 She said to them, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: Tell the man who sent you to me, 16 `This is what the LORD says: I am going to bring disaster on this place and its people, according to everything written in the book the king of Judah has read. 17 Because they have forsaken me and burned incense to other gods and provoked me to anger by all the idols their hands have made, my anger will burn against this place and will not be quenched.’ 18 Tell the king of Judah, who sent you to inquire of the LORD, `This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says concerning the words you heard: 19 Because your heart was responsive and you humbled yourself before the LORD when you heard what I have spoken against this place and its people, that they would become accursed and laid waste, and because you tore your robes and wept in my presence, I have heard you, declares the LORD. 20 Therefore I will gather you to your fathers, and you will be buried in peace. Your eyes will not see all the disaster I am going to bring on this place.’“ So they  took her answer back to the king.
Ex. 15:20-21 

Miriam, specifically stated as being a prophetess, sang a prophetic song:
Then Miriam the prophetess, Aaron’s sister, took a tambourine in her hand, and all the women followed her, with tambourines and dancing. 21 Miriam sang to them: “Sing to the LORD, for he is highly exalted. The horse and its rider he has hurled into the sea.”
2Ch. 9:5-8

The queen of Sheba spoke a prophetic word:
She said to the king, “The report I heard in my own country about your achievements and your wisdom is true. 6 But I did not believe what they said until I came and saw with my own eyes. Indeed, not even half the greatness of your wisdom was told me; you have far exceeded the report I heard. 7 How happy your men must be! How happy your officials, who continually stand before you and hear your wisdom! 8 Praise be to the LORD your God, who has delighted in you and placed you on his throne as king to rule for the LORD your God. Because of the love of your God for Israel and his desire to uphold them for ever, he has made you king over them, to maintain justice and righteousness.”
The New Testament

Lk. 1:41-45

Elizabeth spoke prophetically:
41 When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. 42 In a loud voice she exclaimed: “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! 43 But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? 44 As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. 45 Blessed is she who has believed that what the Lord has said to her will be accomplished!”
Luke 1:46-55

Mary's prophetic utterance:
And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord 47 and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, 48 for he has been mindful of the humble state of his servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed, 49 for the Mighty One has done great things for me — holy is his name. 50 His mercy extends to those who fear him, from generation to generation. 51 He has performed mighty deeds with his arm; he has scattered those who are proud in their inmost thoughts. 52 He has brought down rulers from their thrones but has lifted up the humble. 53 He has filled the hungry with good things but has sent the rich away empty. 54 He has helped his servant Israel, remembering to be merciful 55 to Abraham and his descendants for ever, even as he said to our fathers.”
Luke 2:36-38

Anna's words, though not recorded, were noted:
There was also a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was very old; she had lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, 37 and then was a widow until she was eighty-four. She never left the temple but worshiped night and day, fasting and praying. 38 Coming up to them at that very moment, she gave thanks to God and spoke about the child to all who were looking forward to the redemption of Jerusalem.
Mark 16:7 

Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome were given a prophetic message:
But go, tell his disciples and Peter, "He is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you."
So the literal word of the Lord came forth from the lips of women. Those words became Scripture. Those words carried unique and powerful Holy Spirit messages that changed the fate of nations, even the world.

Women, therefore, communicated the very word of God, and are a central part of God's redemptive plan. To overlook their contributions, inspiration, or impact on the Bible is an unfortunate and false perspective.

Monday, April 22, 2024

The Mailbag: Potpourri (Women Bible Translators… Doctrinally sound deliverance ministry… Brain fog and Bible/book reading) - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
--------------

Ms. Lesley is back, once again parsing 1 Timothy 2:12, which she doesn't even bother to quote:
1Ti. 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 
She writes to add yet another subdoctrine derived from an improper application of this verse. This astonishingly bad and unbiblical description ought to be an embarrassment, but she presents it as unassailable truth. 

This verse is not describing a church service, it's not about what pastors do, and it has nothing to do with what generic women can or cannot do on Sunday. You can read our explanation here.

We must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
------------------

Friday, April 19, 2024

Wayback Wednesday ~ Risky Business - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
-------

The author takes issue with what some people supposedly say about taking risks in faith. But she then concedes that walking in faith is indeed risky. 
-------

Monday, February 5, 2024

The Mailbag: Potpourri (...Women giving pro-life talks in church) - Michelle Lesley

Excerpted from here. Our comments in bold.
---------------------------

Ms. Lesley is back from her blog hiatus and quickly returns to parsing 1 Timothy 2:12, creating yet another micro doctrine about things women cannot do in church.

Here's the verse:
1Ti. 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
We note that Ms. Lesley never quotes this verse or any Bible verse. Her presentation is simply another speculation based on a mistaken understanding of this verse. There is nothing here or anywhere in the Bible about a woman giving a "brief, personal testimony" and there is nothing about forbidding a woman from replacing the sermon.

We extensively discuss the role of women in church here.

Further, the Bible does not tell us "pastors, preach the word." Let's quote the verse: 
2Ti. 4:2 Preach the Word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage — with great patience and careful instruction.
This was Paul's instruction to Timothy, not to pastors. And Timothy wasn't a pastor, which we discuss here. And, the verse does not tell us anything about preaching in a church service, but rather preaching in season and out of season (i.e., the proclamation of the Gospel in every place at every opportunity). 

There is a difference between preaching and teaching. They are two different things: 

Mt. 4:23 Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the people.

Here we find that Jesus was doing three different things, teaching, preaching and healing. 

"Teaching" is didaskó, 1. absolutely, a. to hold discourse with others in order to instruct them...

"Preaching" is kérussó, b. specifically used of the public proclamation of the gospel...

Therefore, Paul's instruction to Timothy in 2Ti. 4:2 was to preach (kérussó) the word, i.e., proclaim the Gospel. We can easily confirm this assertion because only three verses later Paul instructed Timothy:
2Ti. 4:5 ...do the work of an evangelist...
Evangelists preach the Gospel.

Now, we should be clear that Paul did command Timothy to teach (1Ti. 1:3, 1Ti. 4:11, 1Ti. 4:13, 1Ti. 6:2, etc.). But that doesn't make him the pastor because the Bible does not tell us that pastors teach. Pastors care for the flock, and teachers teach (Ep. 4:11). Elders lead the church, not pastors (1Pe. 5:2). 

Paul agrees with Peter about elders leading the church: 
1Ti. 5:17 The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.
Timothy was being instructed about leadership structure in the church. Therefore, Timothy was not the pastor.

Ms. Lesley's answer, then, is wrong from beginning to end. We must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
--------------------

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

The Mailbag: Communion Questions - by Michelle Lesley

Found here. Our comments in bold.
-----------------------

Ms. Lesley answers a question about communion without quoting any Scripture except for the communion text itself. How is this possible? Well, it's rather easy when all she is doing is explaining her tradition.  

There is one fundamental mistake Ms. Lesley makes, and that is she misunderstands a single word, "home(s)" (1Co. 11:22, 34). She writes:

Look at the language in 1 Corinthians 11:17-34 and how it differentiates between eating outside the church gathering (at home) and partaking of the Lord’s Supper inside the worship gathering of the church. 

There were no churches (buildings) in the first century! The worship gathering of the church was at someone's home: 
Ac. 2:46 Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts...
This is communion in a nutshell. Breaking bread is communion, and they did this together in various homes, because the church met in peoples' homes:
Ro. 16:5 Greet also the church that meets at their house.
1Co. 16:19 The churches in the province of Asia send you greetings. Aquila and Priscilla
greet you warmly in the Lord, and so does the church that meets at their house.
Col. 4:15 Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house.
Phile. 2 to Apphia our sister, to Archippus our fellow-soldier and to the church that meets in your home...
Remember that Saul (Paul) was zealous to stop this movement. How did he proceed?
Ac. 8:3 But Saul began to destroy the church. Going from house to house, he dragged off men and women and put them in prison.
The Church met in houses. Saul needed to go from house to house to destroy it. 

So the Corinthian church, meeting in someone's house, was being corrected for the way it treated people at the Lord's Supper meal they ate together when they gathered as the church. In someone's house. 

Thus Paul tells them that they should properly regard the body (every believer in attendance) (1Co. 11:29). Paul's point is, if someone is really that hungry, they should eat at home so that there is enough food for everyone (1Co. 11:34).

We really don't need to go any farther. But because this idea of communion as a solemn church ceremony done alone and in silence is not found in the Bible, we feel compelled to make a more thorough case. So let's examine the aftermath of Peter's vision of the sheet descending from heaven. A man called Cornelius sent some men to Peter to invite him to his house, so he went:

Ac. 10:25-27 As Peter entered the house, Cornelius met him and fell at his feet in reverence. 26 But Peter made him get up. “Stand up,” he said, “I am only a man myself.” 27 Talking with him, Peter went inside and found a large gathering of people.

Cornelius invited a lot of people to hear Peter. So Peter gave a Gospel message, which concluded with:
Ac. 10:43-48 All the prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.” 44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message.
This was a momentous occurrence, for it was here that the Jewish believers finally understood that the outpoured Holy Spirit (Ac. 2:17) was also for the gentiles:
45 The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles. 46 For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. Then Peter said, 47 “Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have.” 48 So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.
Notice they were baptized at Cornelius' house, which Ms. Lesley also thinks should only be done in a church building. Let's keep reading:
Ac. 11:1-3 The apostles and the brothers throughout Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God. 2 So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcised believers criticized him 3 and said, “You went into the house of uncircumcised men and ate with them.”
This is the last piece of the puzzle. Not only did Peter have a church service at someone's house, he baptized new believers and also ate with them (communion).

Ms. Lesley states, you wouldn’t (I hope) baptize people at your Tupperware party or even your weekly women’s Bible study, and you shouldn’t be observing the Lord’s Supper in those sorts of venues either.

Well, Peter did it, so why not? Ms. Lesley will not supply any Bible verse in support of her opinion, so we must deem this Bad Bible Teaching.
-----------------