The GOP Tax Plan Tells Us Everything About Who Matters In American Democracy - BY ZACH CARTER

Found here. My comments in bold.

---------------------


This post originally appeared at HuffPost.
The United States is the richest country in the history of the world. Last year, the genius and muscle of the American people generated more than $18.6 trillion in wealth. This year, our brains and brawn will combine to create well over $19 trillion. Despite all the debt theatrics of the Republican Party during the Obama presidency, we owe just $6.2 trillion to other countries — less than four months of our collective labors at their present value. (There are at least three non sequiturs in this paragraph. 

First, the Republicans have not made the debt to other countries an issue. It is always been the debt in whole. 

Second, The value of America's private sector is not relevant to government debt. Government debt must be compared to government revenue. 

Third, the amount of debt does not mean the debt is justified. A small debt achieved irresponsibly is still unacceptable.)

Under these circumstances, the question of what the American government can afford is functionally meaningless. (That is, under the dishonest criteria offered by the author, government apparently can afford much more. However, if we look at government revenue to debt, the story is starkly different. 

In addition, the author seems to think that the productivity of the private sector is a government asset. But actually, that money belongs to those who earned it.)

If any nation has ever been able to afford quality housing, education, health care, parks, museums — anything — the United States can. (The author continues to conflate government and the private sector. Also, we have quality housing, education, healthcare, parks, and museums.)

And we ("we" means government.)

don’t need to tax anyone, rich or poor, in order to afford these fine things. The wealth — the fruits of our labor — already exists. (? The author seems to be suggesting that all these things can be taken care of by the private sector, so taxation is unnecessary. I kind of doubt this is what he intended to say...)

Taxes are a way of managing the bookkeeping system, of setting national priorities for the distribution of wealth created by good ideas and hard work. (Ah, so he didn't intend to say that. He wants taxation, for the purpose of "distribution of wealth," which of course means the rich have too much money and government's job is to spread it around. But actually, taxation is the method by which the constitutional functions of government are funded. 

Government does not have the ability to ascertain national priorities. And it shouldn't have the ability to fund those priorities by appropriating peoples' money.) 
That’s key: Our country’s wealth is created by everybody. (No, people created their wealth. It's not our country's wealth.)

It’s not created by rich people. Rich people are what happen when the bookkeeping units we use to keep track of that wealth — the dollars — get stuck on particular individuals. ("Stuck?" Only in the pink unicorn world of the Left could it be considered that the money someone earns is "stuck" and needs to be freed up for the objectives of government.)

Sometimes these people fall into the world possessing such accounting anomalies in the form of inheritances. ("Anomalies?" That is, a person who dies and passes on his own property to his children is an anomaly that apparently shouldn't happen.)

Sometimes they siphon them from other people through the daily operations of commerce. ("Siphon?" does the author mean that some people hand their money over to others in exchange for the goods and services they desire to possess?) 

Sometimes Washington decides to hand them more. (Suggesting of course that the money belonged to government first.)

On Thursday, President Donald Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) and congressional Republicans proposed a multitrillion-dollar tax cut for a particular slice of very wealthy citizens. There is much more than math at stake: These are matters of justice, social prestige and political power. There is no economic law that governs how the $19 trillion we produce each year must be distributed. (Yes there is. It's called socialism. It's a fatally flawed economic law, but astoundingly popular among the financially ignorant.)

Figuring out who should get how much of that $19 trillion is a political choice — and the Republicans’ choice is to give much of that money to a few hundred financial dynasties. (No, it's only a political choice when politicians get involved. For me it's much more simple. You earned it, you keep it.)

The GOP says its plan is an effort to “fix our broken tax code,” and there can be no doubt that the code is broken. (Yup, and who broke it? The Left wrote it, amended it, complicated it, and expanded it to the point that government has its tentacles in every facet of our financial lives. Incomprehensibly, the GOP only wants to tinker with it. They were most certainly not elected to do that.)

Our fabulously wealthy nation is mysteriously plagued by poverty. (There's no mystery. Poverty is always the lowest quintile of wealth measurement. No matter the actual wealth of people, the lowest fifth is definitionally poor.

In addition, in any society there are always people who are simply bad with money, and there are people who are gifted in creating wealth. it shouldn't surprise us that there is wealth disparity since there is skill disparity.)

More than 40 million Americans currently live in poverty, including 11.5 million children. Over 41 million people live in what the US Department of Agriculture defines as “food insecure households.” Millions of Americans literally could not afford to eat at some point during 2016. Families living a little higher up the economic ladder generally have a tenuous hold on their middle-class status: 78 percent of US households report living paycheck to paycheck.

These economic troubles persist as Wall Street and Silicon Valley are increasingly dividing the spoils of the broader economy among themselves. The financial sector is supposed to function as a sort of utility for manufacturing, agriculture and other elements of what economists call the “real” economy. But today it accounts for nearly 30 percent of corporate profits — about triple its share from three decades ago. Since 2000, compensation in the financial sector has increased at nearly three times the overall rate in the economy. Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook now mimic financial giants by acquiring tech startup after tech startup and then using their merged muscle to consume the profitable activity of others. Google and Facebook together take in 60 percent of the digital advertising market and collected 99 percent of all online ad revenue growth in the past year.

The GOP tax plan won’t resolve any of those problems. Republicans have assembled a host of tax changes that will ensure that more and more of the nation’s wealth goes to the people who already have most of it. (Actually, the tax plan cuts taxes for those who actually pay taxes. They get to keep more of their money, the money doesn't "go to" them.)

It’s a strategy to inflate existing fortunes, increase profits on Wall Street and enhance the social dominance of people who make their living from investments over people who make their living earning wages and salaries. (CEOs make their money from investments? Google and Facebook make their money from investments? Whaa?)

The heart of the Republican plan is a permanent cut to the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent. The benefits of that will accrue to people who own corporations. If you hold stock in a corporation and the tax rate on that corporation’s profits falls, the value of your stock will rise. You become wealthier without doing anything. It doesn’t matter if the company you own pays its workers a living wage, develops state-of-the-art technology or names violent felons to its board of directors. However prudently or recklessly that company had been earning a profit, it will suddenly become more valuable to its owners. (The author wants to imply that all corporations are mega companies with billions of dollars of assets. However, the great majority of corporations are small mom-and pops, neighborhood businesses, and individuals who thought they had a good idea that they could market. But, I suppose it's easier to paint with a broad brush in order to play into peoples' biases.)

That’s just great if you own tons of stock. But according to Gallup polling, only about half of Americans own any stock at all — through a retirement account or otherwise. Most households that do own stock don’t own very much. Only 22 percent of households own at least $25,000 worth of stock, research from New York University economist Edward Wolff shows.

At the top of the distribution, however, stock ownership accounts for a tremendous share of new wealth. On average, households in the top 1 percent receive about 36 percent of their income from financial assets, while the 400 wealthiest American households receive almost 75 percent of their income from capital gains and dividends. It’s not hard to figure out the target market here.

Not so long ago, President George W. Bush took a lot of heat for slashing the tax on capital gains — the tax you pay when you sell stocks, bonds or real estate investments. It was, critics said, a shameless giveaway to the idle rich. The current GOP tax plan offers a similar benefit without the hassle of having to actually sell any investments: When stock prices go up due to a drop in corporate taxes, the people who own the stock get richer. (A tacit admission that government taxation policies depress the market.)

And because the GOP bill will also ultimately eliminate the estate tax, owners of financial assets could pass their holdings to their heirs tax-free in perpetuity, (That is, the money that someone has that has already been taxed won't be taxed again at death.)

allowing financial dynasties to grow and grow independently of the intelligence or enterprise of those stewarding any particular generation of family wealth. (A value judgment not to be made by government.)

No trained economist seriously believes that shoveling unearned benefits to people who just happen to own or inherit financial assets is good for growth, productivity or anything else. (Again, not a matter for government.) 

And Republicans aren’t really trying to hide what they’re up to. In addition to the corporate rate cut, the GOP would allow companies to immediately write off the full value of new capital investments — when, say, a company purchases new equipment or technology. This tax perk would actually encourage some worthwhile activity: If businesses invest in improving their longer-term operations, they will realize an immediate economic benefit from the tax code. Cutting the corporate tax rate down to 20 percent doesn’t encourage anything except a one-time jolt to asset prices. (It's always better for government to take the money, because people can't be trusted to do the right thing with their own money.)

When Republicans dole out big tax cuts, they typically offer something for low- and middle-income families to make the process a little less unseemly. It’s not clear if they’ll be able to include those perks this time around, and the slapdash, piecemeal approach to helping everyone outside the capital class makes their priorities perfectly clear. When the tax framework was released Thursday morning, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) talked up a slightly more generous child tax credit and some additional deductions for middle-class families. The bill itself shows many of the additional deductions are countered by the elimination of other popular deductions. The expanded child tax credit expires after five years, to be replaced by an increase in taxes on families with children, while the corporate rate drops to 20 percent forever. Republicans on Thursday couldn’t promise that their bill wouldn’t ultimately raise taxes on middle-class families. It’s even conceivable that bona fide rich people could end up worse off under the plan if they draw their incomes from a high garden-variety salary, rather than stock or interest.

So never mind the budget deficits and growth projections. The GOP tax plan is a simple political statement about who matters more in American democracy: the heirs to hedge-fund fortunes or everyone else in the country. Trump and the Republicans have chosen the dynasts. This is not a necessity; we could easily afford a different set of priorities. Social domination by the financial sector is a choice.