---------------------------------
Update: Mr. Finnell adds a new post about apostleship where he asks,
"If there were apostles after the ones mentioned in the new testament and if there are apostles living today, why are their writings not included in the Bible? The apostles that Jesus selected wrote Scriptures."Answer: No, most of them did not write Scripture. The writings of Andrew, Thomas, James the Lesser, Philip, Thaddeus, Simon, and Bartholomew are not included in the Bible, because they did not write Scripture.
Mr. Finnell persists in a false understanding of not only apostleship, but also the prophetic. He thinks that all revelation belongs in the Bible, but a junior high Bible student knows this isn't true.
For example, John closes his gospel with this: Jn. 21:25 "Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written." So not even the entirety of Jesus' miraculous deeds are considered Scripture, yet Mr. Finnell seems to believe that contemporary prophetic utterances should be made Scripture.
And he never seems to get around to telling us why pastors' sermons aren't included in the Holy Writ. After all, they're new revelation as well.
Now, on the to original post.
--------------------------
Mr. Finnell Repeats many of the same things as his prior post here, including the title. He does raise some new points which we shall address.
When Mr. Finnell talks about apostles, he's referring to a very specific class of people, chosen by Jesus. So that conveniently excludes anyone else, thus Mr. Finnell can mock and denigrate the idea of modern-day apostles.
Scripturally, this is superficial and base. There are different categories of those who are called apostles. Thayer's Greek Lexicon:
STRONGS NT 652: ἀπόστολοςἀπόστολος, ἀποστόλου, ὁ;
1. a delegate, messenger, one sent forth with orders (Herodotus 1, 21; 5, 38; for שָׁלוּחַ in 1 Kings 14:6 (Alex.); rabbinical שְׁלִיחַ): John 13:16 (where ὁ ἀπόστολος and ὁ πέμψαςαὐτόν are contrasted); followed by a genitive, as τῶν ἐκκλησιῶν, 2 Corinthians 8:23;Philippians 2:25; ἀπόστολον ... τῆςὁμολογίας ἡμῶν the apostle whom we confess, of Christ, God's chief messenger, who has brought the κλῆσις ἀπουρανιος, as compared with Moses, whom the Jews confess, Hebrews 3:1.
2. Specially applied to the twelve disciples whom Christ selected, out of the multitude of his adherents, to be his constant companions and the heralds to proclaim to men the kingdom of God: Matthew 10:1-4; Luke 6:13; Acts 1:26;Revelation 21:14, and often, but nowhere in the Gospel and Epistles of John; ("the wordἀπόστολος occurs 79 times in the N. T., and of these 68 instances are in St. Luke and St. Paul." Lightfoot). With these apostles Paul claimed equality, because through a heavenly intervention he had been appointed by the ascended Christ himself to preach the gospel among the Gentiles, and owed his knowledge of the way of salvation not to man's instruction but to direct revelation from Christ himself, and moreover had evinced his apostolic qualifications by many signal proofs: Galatians 1:1, 11;Galatians 2:8; 1 Corinthians 1:17; 1 Corinthians 9:1; 1 Corinthians 15:8-10; 2 Corinthians 3:2ff; 12:12; 1 Timothy 2:7; 2 Timothy 1:11, cf. Acts 26:12-20. According to Paul, apostles surpassed as well the various other orders of Christian teachers (cf. διδάσκαλος, εὐαγγελιστής,προφήτης), as also the rest of those on whom the special gifts (cf. χάρισμα) of the Holy Spirit had been bestowed, by receiving a richer and more copious conferment of the Spirit: 1 Corinthians 12:28; Ephesians 4:11. Certain false teachers are rated sharply for arrogating to themselves the name and authority of apostles of Christ: 2 Corinthians 11:5, 13; Revelation 2:2.
3. In a broader sense the name is transferred to other eminent Christian teachers; as Barnabas,Acts 14:14, and perhaps also Timothy and Silvanus, 1 Thessalonians 2:7 (6), cf. too Romans 16:7 (?). But in Luke 11:49; Ephesians 3:5; Revelation 18:20, 'apostles' is to be taken in the narrower sense. (On the application of the term see especially Lightfoot on Galatians, pp. 92-101; Harnack, on 'Teaching etc. 11, 3 [ET]; cf.BB. DD. under the word)
Given this we will see the superficial nature of Mr. Finnell's analysis, based on a faulty construct of what constitutes an apostle.
-----------------------------------
Some claim that there are apostles alive and well, living among us. Is that fact or fiction?
QUESTION: What purpose would modern day apostles serve? (Mr. Finnell only needs to read his Bible: Ep. 4:11-12 "It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers, to prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up...")
QUESTION: What purpose would modern day apostles serve? (Mr. Finnell only needs to read his Bible: Ep. 4:11-12 "It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers, to prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up...")
QUESTION: If there are apostles today, why do they not mirror the acts of the apostles of the first century? (Our response is two questions: Why should they? And, how does he know they don't?)
Acts 2:43 Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles.
Are people being filled with awe by the so-called modern day apostles? (Yes.)
If that were true it would be on every TV network. It would dominate the cable TV channels. (Not true, especially given the media hostility to all things Christian. And also, it's not relevant.)
The Internet would flooded with accounts of these so-called modern day apostles. (The internet is indeed flooded with these kinds of accounts, but that also not relevant.)
ACTS OF THE FIRST CENTURY APOSTLES
The apostle Paul cause the magician Elymas to be temporarily blinded.(Acts 13:8-12)
Are the so-called contemporary apostles causing men to go blind? No. (How does he know this? Maybe he should look at the internet himself.)
The apostle Peter brought Tabitha back from the dead. (Acts 9:36-41)
Are the 21 century pretend-apostles bring people back from the dead? No. If they could bring men back from the dead they would invite TV crews into funeral homes, to witness their miracles. (Again, since Mr. Finnell so values the internet, he would find videos like these. Mr. Finnell will probably move the goal posts by doubting the veracity of these videos, but remember his point: There is nothing on the internet about miraculous happenings.
ACTS OF THE FIRST CENTURY APOSTLES
The apostle Paul cause the magician Elymas to be temporarily blinded.(Acts 13:8-12)
Are the so-called contemporary apostles causing men to go blind? No. (How does he know this? Maybe he should look at the internet himself.)
The apostle Peter brought Tabitha back from the dead. (Acts 9:36-41)
Are the 21 century pretend-apostles bring people back from the dead? No. If they could bring men back from the dead they would invite TV crews into funeral homes, to witness their miracles. (Again, since Mr. Finnell so values the internet, he would find videos like these. Mr. Finnell will probably move the goal posts by doubting the veracity of these videos, but remember his point: There is nothing on the internet about miraculous happenings.
He claims they would invite TV crews into funeral homes? Whaaa? Is that what Paul did, called in a crowd of Scribes to get some publicity? This borders on puerile, Mr. Finnell.)
The apostle Peter predicted the immediate death of Sapphira. (Acts 5:1-11)
Can the false modern day apostles predict the immediate death of people who lie to God? Of course they cannot. (They can't? Proof, please.)
The apostle Peter immediately healed a lame man who had been lame from birth. (Acts 3:1-10)
If these so-call modern day apostles could heal men who were lame from birth it would on every, nightly, TV news broadcast. (No, it wouldn't. See, this is easy. Mr. Finnell makes a bare assertion, we make a bare dismissal.)
And by the way, if indeed these miracles aren't happening, it doesn't prove they shouldn't be.)
Can the false modern day apostles predict the immediate death of people who lie to God? Of course they cannot. (They can't? Proof, please.)
The apostle Peter immediately healed a lame man who had been lame from birth. (Acts 3:1-10)
If these so-call modern day apostles could heal men who were lame from birth it would on every, nightly, TV news broadcast. (No, it wouldn't. See, this is easy. Mr. Finnell makes a bare assertion, we make a bare dismissal.)
And by the way, if indeed these miracles aren't happening, it doesn't prove they shouldn't be.)
THE SIGNS OF AN APOSTLE
2 Corinthians 12:12 The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with all perseverance, by signs and wonders and miracles.
The so-called modern day apostles are missing the signs of a true apostle. (Another bare assertion.)
2 Corinthians 12:12 The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with all perseverance, by signs and wonders and miracles.
The so-called modern day apostles are missing the signs of a true apostle. (Another bare assertion.)
Be careful not to get detoured down the wrong road by following false sign makers.
WE DO NOT NEED SO-CALLED MODERN DAY APOSTLES!
We have the completed Bible. We have all the information we need for salvation and living the Christian life. God's word was confirmed by Jesus and the apostles of the first century. (Mr. Finnell is now confusing prophets with apostles.)
2 Timothy 3:15-17 and from childhood you have know the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.
By A.D. 100 men had all the Scripture they needed for salvation and living the Christian life.
WE HAVE THE RECORDED WORD OF GOD. THE BIBLE.
WE DO NOT NEED SO-CALLED MODERN DAY APOSTLES! (The two propositions do not come to bear on each other. The need to "...prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up..." is ongoing and dare we say even more crucial in these days. What happens regarding the prophetic is a separate issue.
WE DO NOT NEED SO-CALLED MODERN DAY APOSTLES!
We have the completed Bible. We have all the information we need for salvation and living the Christian life. God's word was confirmed by Jesus and the apostles of the first century. (Mr. Finnell is now confusing prophets with apostles.)
2 Timothy 3:15-17 and from childhood you have know the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.
By A.D. 100 men had all the Scripture they needed for salvation and living the Christian life.
WE HAVE THE RECORDED WORD OF GOD. THE BIBLE.
WE DO NOT NEED SO-CALLED MODERN DAY APOSTLES! (The two propositions do not come to bear on each other. The need to "...prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up..." is ongoing and dare we say even more crucial in these days. What happens regarding the prophetic is a separate issue.
Mr. Finnell is confused, and has a demonstrated ignorance of the things he tries to criticize. He doesn't understand what his opponents believe or why. So, his critiques come off as ridiculous and nonsensical, because he's refuting a straw man.
With certainty he proclaims his positions, woefully unaware of even the most rudimentary features of what he is criticizing. With bellicose, pompous statements, he proclaims his "facts" like they were self-evident.
Well sir, they're not.)
Greetings.
ReplyDeleteThe issue "Are there apostles working among us today?" is not a question of theology only but one of a physical nature. Unlike most spiritual issues such as salvation, faith, church organization and so on, this question can be tested using the same principles that we apply to scientific research. If the hypothesis is that apostles of the manner as the 1st century are working among us today would there be noticeable evidence? The obvious answer is yes, there surely would be evidence and lots of it. The very flow and form of their office was to proclaim the gospel of Christ through scripture and SIGNS AND WONDERS.
"The signs of a TRUE APOSTLE were performed among you with utmost patience, with signs and wonders and mighty works." (2nd Corinthians 12:12 RSV)
Just as the people could not debate the works of the apostles of the 1st century, such as in Acts 4:16-17 neither should we find the need to debate it today. But alas we do, as these and many other posts prove. I personally would prefer to be wrong on this issue and would welcome a chance to meet a living apostle. But we must not allow our theology, emotions or pride to blind us to the readily apparent truth.
Steve Finnell's post is not referring to the many people who claim the title of apostle simply because they are "messengers sent forth" as you have suggested, But refer to those who claim both the AUTHORITY and ABILITIES of the 1st century apostles, such as the Mormon apostles do today. I am surprised this has to be pointed out. So yes we can exchange scriptures back and forth about the need or command to have apostles but this does not excuse ourselves of closing our eyes to the obvious. Your answer to the question, "If there are apostles today, why do they not mirror the acts of the apostles of the century?" is rather telling and exposes your willingness to ignore such a glaring weakness in your rebuttal.
Simply put, your response is off base and needs to be rethought. We can not turn a blind eye to the lack of physical proof that should be quite abundant just to protect our personal theology.
Sir, your lack of awareness of the "proof" you seek is not evidence such things don't happen. Nor does it speak to the Scriptural case to be made for or against modern day apostles.
ReplyDeleteAnd you are quite wrong about recognition of apostles. People in the first century quite vigorously debated about them. 2 Cor. 11 is ample proof of that.
Perhaps you might address one of the main thrusts of my rebuttal before judging it inadequate. Mr.Finnell and you both place requirements on modern day apostles which the Scriptures do not, because there are various forms of apostles. There is no scriptural requirement at all for a modern day apostle to do signs and wonders.
Greetings.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your prompt reply.
I agree that my personal lack of awareness can not be labeled as "proof" of the non-existence of this or any other notion. I am not appealing simply to my own experiences or senses but the world's as a whole. We do not live in a vacuum separated and ignorant of the comings and goings of the world around us. We are, for the most part quite aware of what is happening both near and far. We live in a time and place that even without purposeful searching are exposed to events both important and mundane. It is this appeal to the apparent that I am speaking of. It is an appeal that is common, accepted and necessary. To suggest that we simply ignore this for the sake of advancing some "scriptural case" is willful blindness.
Your use of 2nd Corinthians 11 is off base. This chapter speaks not of the debate on IF apostles exist BUT Paul's defense of his true apostleship over the many false apostles of his time.
I do not mandate, as you have implied, requirements for modern day apostles but simply point out the glaring differences between the two. Your response of "Why should they? And, how does he know they don't?" is an ad hoc defense at best and a complete REMOVING of the goal posts.
It is of little practical consequence today if someone either bestows upon himself or is given the title of apostle by others, but it is a confusing and many times a self-absorbing act. To label someone an "Apostle" simply because thay have a "message to send forth" shows a lack of respect for the office as much as someone claiming to be a "Christ" just because someone poured oil on their head. Mr. Finnel's post is about those who use the title "Apostle" to hold sway over those who understand the more biblical meaning of the word. I believe you knew this all along.
A common aspect to these debates is the lack of names given out as examples of true modern day apostles. If I knew of one I would yell it on the roof tops and not spend time presenting a biblical discourse on the subject.
I look forward to your reply.
Whether or not there are apostles one can name today is completely irrelevant. The Scriptures quite clearly call for them per Eph 4:11. If no modern apostles can be named today, it only points to our failure as a church to obey and embrace the clear teachings of the Scriptures.
ReplyDeleteGreetings.
DeleteThe obvious is never irrelevant. Jesus Himself appealed to the readily apparent.
"But if I do then, even though you do not believe Me, believe the WORKS, that you may KNOW AND UNDERSTAND that the Father is in me. and I in the Father." (John 10:38 NIV)
Your use of Eph. 4:11 is a classic example of reading too much into a verse. Paul's use of the words, apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers is nothing more than his personal verbiage to show that Jesus has and will send forth messengers to proclaim His gospel. This sentence is in no way presenting a list of distinct offices or hierarchy of leadership or even the continuation of each one. You are simply grasping at straws.
Your demand for a scriptural case does not hold water. Unlike the office of elder or deacon, the Bible has no arguments for or against the continued office of "Apostle". Your insistence for a "scriptural case" is nothing more then a self-imposed and self-serving deflection of the issue. Turning an easily answerable question into an impossible to settle debate. This demand for biblical proof of the non-existence of modern day Apostles reeks of a defense of a pre-conceived notion and not a honest search for the truth. This lack of evidence is the "elephant in the room" that you are trying to ignore. Your lack of acceptance of the obvious is the prefect field of battle that atheists love to argue from. "See how silly Christians are, they won't even admit the world is round".
I don't know your background but I suspect your continued defense on this issue is tied to a set of denominational beliefs, and you find it difficult to separate this issue from the rest. You seem to not want to tackle the real issue at hand and prefer to banter on about the different ways people can interpret the word apostle. Mr. Finnell has made it quite clear that he is not speaking about the average Joe who wants to be called apostle because he has a "message to send forth" but to those who claim both the ability and authority of the first century apostles. The lack of Apostles today does not imply the Bible is fraudulent, since the Bible makes no claim of their continued existence. I have read many of your posts, you are a smart and talented writer but seem to be willfully blind on this point.
I look forward to you reply.