Gubernatorial candidate Greg Gianforte has taken Montana politics in an ugly direction.

I receive up to 5 email solicitations from the Democrats per day. The latest one said this:

"Gubernatorial candidate Greg Gianforte has taken Montana politics in an ugly direction." -- Bozeman Chronicle Editorial Board

 In a blistering editorial, Greg Gianforte’s local newspaper took him to task for his latest fear-mongering attacks.

Show you agree and donate $15 to send a message to Greg Gianforte that these kinds of scare tactics won't be tolerated. 

Here's the ad in question:

According to factcheck.org, "...over the next two fiscal years, it is possible that the U.S. will accept 185,000 total refugees from around the world, but not just from Syria."

Questions for the Montana Democrat Party:

How many of these refugees are potentially terrorists? Answer: Unknown. It is impossible to know who is hiding something when coming from third world countries with spotty record-keeping. Montana represents .4% of the nation's population. That means we could have 808 refugees come in. If the number of  terrorists is even 1%, that's 8 terrorists in Montana alone. Even the Huffington Post acknowledges that at least 4% of the refugees are very positive regarding ISIS.

What amount of risk is the Montana Democrat Party willing to take, or more specifically, what amount of risk is the Montana Democrat Party willing to force upon the rest of us in pursuit of their open borders desires?

What part of Gianforte's position (Ban refugees from countries that harbor terrorists, stop refugee resettlement until we know they can be properly vetted, prevent attacks) is in any way unreasonable?

Why shouldn't a nation be able to control it's own borders in any way it sees fit?

 The risk is real, substantial, and not worth taking. Gianforte is not fear-mongering, he's being a realist.