Clarity Not Charity - by Tim Bates (The song "Reckless Love")

Found here. Our comments in bold.
-------------------

The song under scrutiny is "Reckless Love," by Cory Asbury. The lyrics read:

Vs. 1: Before I spoke a word, You were singing over me
You have been so, so good to me

Before I took a breath, You breathed Your life in me
You have been so, so kind to me

Chorus: Oh, the overwhelming, never-ending, reckless love of God
Oh, it chases me down, fights 'til I'm found, leaves the ninety-nine
I couldn't earn it, and I don't deserve it, still, You give Yourself away
Oh, the overwhelming, never-ending, reckless love of God, yeah

vs 2: When I was Your foe, still Your love fought for me
You have been so, so good to me

When I felt no worth, You paid it all for me
You have been so, so kind to me

Bridge: There's no shadow You won't light up

Mountain You won't climb up
Coming after me

There's no wall You won't kick down
Lie You won't tear down

Coming after me
There's no shadow You won't light up

Mountain You won't climb up
Coming after me

There's no wall You won't kick down
Lie You won't tear down
Coming after me

---------------

Good communication requires the sender and receiver to interact based on the same information. As anyone who has ever lived knows, a lot of communication is nonverbal.

“How are you?”
“Good.”

That conversation consists of 4 words but it can be interpreted many different ways depending on the tone of voice, the context of the question and answer, the quickness of the reply, eye contact, or any variety of signals. Our everyday conversations demand some effort on our part to convey a clear message.

How much more important must it be when we’re singing together on Sunday? How vital is it that everyone knows what we’re singing? I’m not merely referring to the practical aspect of audibly comprehending the words being enunciated, but intellectually grasping the truths being articulated.

So also you, unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air. 1 Cor. 14:9

Paul here, interestingly enough, is speaking about those who use tongues without an interpreter during their corporate gatherings. The principle (everyone should be on the same page) does apply in the context of this post. If we are all singing a song and the songwriter is unclear in his message, then he is speaking, and we are singing, into thin air. Each person will take his or her interpretation of the lyrics and proceed accordingly. One of the fundamental purposes of singing as a church body is uniformity. People of all types of giftedness, background, age, height, weight, and wealth gather together and sing aloud a uniform truth. This uniform proclamation unites us.

We could all sing at the same time and be united, but we wouldn’t be unified. We are unified when we are all singing the same truth. A friend of mine recently referenced the incredible reality of the seemingly simple song, “Our God Saves” (A good song, of course, written by Paul Baloche. This is the same Paul Baloche who wrote "Above All," sung by Michael W. Smith. Smith is regularly criticized for not being orthodox. And "Above All" is viewed as questionable in certain circles.

There are "doctrinal police" who think that singing songs of certain organizations is wrong because of supposed doctrinal falsity.  Which means we shouldn't sing Baloche's songs because he associates with false Christians like Michael W. Smith. Or something.

Really, we wish these folks would make up their minds.)

when sung by a whole church. You can look around your congregation and everyone singing is testifying a rather simple and irrefutable truth: God saves. The message is clear.

The problem, dear friends, is when a song is decidedly not clear. “Reckless Love” is a hot button song today. The controversy ultimately hinges on the song’s operative word. One person says it means XYZ, another says it means ABC, and yet another says it means LMNOP. The song is then unhelpful due to its ambiguous word choice. (Unambiguity is in the eye of the beholder. The whole of the song describes God's incredible love. It makes clear the unusual lengths God goes to when He seeks and saves the lost. The song is one long definition of God's boundless love. 

Given the obvious context of the song, we don't think using the word "reckless" is ambiguous at all.

If we are truly worried about what songs mean, then we need to mention "Come Thy Fount," Where we puzzle at the phrase "my ebeneezer."

Or what a "bulwark" is in "A Mighty Fortress."

Or "diadem" in "All Hail the Power of Jesus' Name."

Thus, we might begin to show concern at where all this would all stop.)

“But Tim, the song means sooo much to me. It’s really helped me. I’ve grown. In my spirit I am blessed and edified.”

That’s great that it has. I rejoice that, insofar as the song is true, you’ve grown as a result of it. I do not deny that people have. You may chew the meat and spit out the bones, and I suppose that’s just fine.

16 Otherwise if you bless in the spirit only, how will the one who fills the place of the ungifted say the “Amen” at your giving of thanks, since he does not know what you are saying? 17 For you are giving thanks well enough, but the other person is not edified. 1 Cor. 14:16-17

You could write a beautiful song to God where He knows what you mean and you know what you mean and it could be a wonderful thing. The Holy Spirit intercedes for us because we are too often unable to communicate a coherent message to God (Romans 8:26-27). (Does He not intercede for the song "Reckless Love?")

That’s not necessarily a sin issue, it’s just a human limitation issue. I’ve often been unable to say something aloud that I know in my head. “I just can’t find the words,” is what we often catch ourselves saying. God does know what we’re saying even when we can’t quite express it. Those emotions and feelings, genuine and Godly as they may be, would not make a good worship song.

If I wrote a song that was hotly debated as to its meaning, then that song should not be sung corporately. This doesn’t mean I’m a heretic; it just means my song isn’t clear. Here is an instance where we choose clarity over charity. If we chose to be charitable to me and my word selection we don’t help the body of Christ. In fact, we harm it. The only edifying words are clear words.

19 however, in the church I desire to speak five words with my mind so that I may instruct others also, rather than ten thousand words in a tongue. 1 Cor. 14:19

(There are plenty of bad songs out there, old and new. And we rightly discern their appropriateness for congregational singing. But this hair-splitting does no one any favors. The purpose of worship is to use the vehicle of music to bless God and edify believers. If the song does that and is not doctrinally incorrect, there should be no other obstacle for its use.)