13 Ridiculous Things Ben Carson Actually Believes - BY KIRA LERNER

Found here. Reproduced here for fair use and discussion purposes. My comments in bold.
-----------------------------------------

Former neurosurgeon Ben Carson has become an unlikely frontrunner in the GOP presidential primary, leading recent polls in Iowa and surpassing all of the other Republican candidates’ recent fundraising totals.

Though he has never held political office, his short time in the spotlight has given him plenty of opportunity to make controversial and often factually incorrect statements. In May, ThinkProgress highlighted seven ridiculous things that Ben Carson believes. But in the past six months, Carson (Um, Dr. Carson. You will note in this article that the author never refers to Dr. Carson as Dr. I suspect this is a subtle way to diminish him. The author refers to him as "Carson" 27 times, and "Ben Carson" twice.)
has come up with even more incendiary remarks and comparisons, which seem to only help his campaign.

Here are 13 arguments that Carson has made during his political career:

Women who get abortions are like slaveholders

On NBC’s Meet the Press in October, Carson compared women who terminate their unwanted pregnancies to slaveowners who “thought that they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave.” (Here's the full quote, found on thinkprogress' own website: 

"Think about this. During slavery — and I know that’s one of those words you’re not supposed to say, but I’m saying it. During slavery, a lot of the slaveowners thought that they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave. Anything that they chose to do. And, you know, what if the abolitionists had said “I don’t believe in slavery, I think it’s wrong, but you guys do whatever you want to do.”

So, did he say that "women who get abortions are like slaveholders?" Well, no. He employed an analogy, something thinkprogress appears to be unfamiliar with. An analogy is a rhetorical device used to explain a concept. What concept was he explaining? That a helpless person, under the control of a power, should not be unjustly treated, exploited, or put to death, simply because of their status.)

He went on to call for an outlaw of abortion, even in cases of rape and incest. “I would not be in favor of killing a baby because the baby came about in that way,” he said.

Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery

Carson’s abortion comments were just the latest in a series of arguments he has made comparing things to slavery. Back in 2013, when Carson was still gaining recognition in the Republican Party, he said in a speech that “Obamacare is really I think the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”

“And it is in a way, it is slavery in a way, because it is making all of us subservient to the government, and it was never about health care,” he added. “It was about control.”
‘Hitler’ could happen in the U.S. today. (So, if by the force of a power one is made to do things one wouldn't otherwise do, isn't that definitionally slavery? It seems the author's idea of slavery is restricted to people laboring in fields for a plantation owner. But slavery at its base is someone being forced to serve another's interests.

So Dr. Carson's analogy is apt.) 

Similarly, Carson has made a series of comments invoking Nazi Germany since launching his campaign. In September, he said at a campaign event that a Nazi-like force could come to power in the United States.

“If you go back and look at the history of the world, tyranny and despotism and how it starts, it has a lot to do with control of thought and control of speech,” he said, although he refused to outright say he was referring to President Obama. (Since the premise of the article is the ridiculous things Dr. Carson has said, it would be helpful if the author might identify what it is that is ridiculous about this statement.)

Jews could have prevented the Holocaust if they had guns

In an interview with CNN in October, Carson blamed the Holocaust on the fact that Nazis took guns away from the Jewish people. “I think the likelihood of Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed,” Carson said. “There’s a reason these dictatorial people take the guns first.” (The author misrepresents what Dr. Carson said. The author quotes Dr. Carson, then substitutes terms. Dr. Carson did not say "Jews could have prevented the Holocaust if they had guns," he said "Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed..."

This is a typical strategy of the Left, inserting thoughts not present in order to impugn or negate.)

When pressed about why he repeatedly uses Nazi metaphors, Carson blamed the media for stirring controversy, saying that he’s heard “from many people in the Jewish community, including rabbis, who said, ‘You’re spot on. You are exactly right.’”

College campuses should be monitored for liberal political speech

On Glenn Beck’s radio program in October, Carson advocated for the censorship of “extreme political bias” on college campuses, saying the Department of Education should “monitor our institutions of higher education for extreme political bias and deny federal funding if it exists.” (Again we find the author's characterization of Dr. Carson's remarks diverging from what was actually said.)

The next day, he clarified during a different conservative radio program that his plan wouldn’t hurt conservatives. When host Dana Loesch asked if “the pendulum would swing the other way and we would see sort of like monitoring of political speech for conservatives,” Carson assured her that it would not. “I think we would have to put in very strict guidelines for the way that that was done,” he said. (When you follow the link to rightwingwatch, you will find that Dr. Carson did not exempt conservative speech from scrutiny. Again, the characterization of his remarks diverge from what he actually said.)

Muslims should be disqualified from the presidency

During an interview on Meet the Press in September, Carson now infamously said that a Muslim could not become the president of the United States. “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation,” he said. “I absolutely would not agree with that.” (This is becoming a trend. Yet again we find no reference to the phrase "could not become president of the United States." Dr. Carson sensibly asserted he would not support a person who is beholden to something other than the Constitution of the United States.)

Instead of apologizing, Carson went on to explain his remarks. In order for a Muslim to become president, he said, “you have to reject the tenets of Islam.” (Which is quite true. A devout Muslim must adhere to the tenets of Islam first and foremost.)

There’s a war on ‘what’s inside of women’

During a campaign stop this summer, Carson denied the argument used to describe the Republican Party’s policies that restrict women’s rights. ("War on women" is not an argument, it's a bumper sticker slogan.)

“There is no war on women,” he said. “There may be a war on what’s inside of women, but there is no war on women in this country.” (Once again we ask for what is supposedly ridiculous about this statement.)

Being gay is a choice because prison turns people gay

Carson said in a CNN interview in March that homosexuality is a choice, citing people who “go into prison straight – and when they come out, they’re gay” as proof. He later attempted to apologize for the remarks in which he addressed those who were offended, but reinforced his belief that sexual orientation is chosen. (Inelegantly phrased, perhaps, but Dr. Carson's point is clear. Homosexual behavior is always chosen.)

Carson has also called marriage equality a “Marxist plot,” (Well, here is a collection of articles by Marxists regarding the topic. You draw your own conclusion.)

described marriage equality supporters as “enemies of America,” and compared homosexuality to pedophilia and bestiality, another statement that led him to similarly “apologize” for his “poorly chosen words.” (Here's his statement, quoted in the author's provided link: 

"No group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA [the North American Man/Boy Love Association], be they people who believe in beastiality, it doesn’t matter what they are, they don’t get to change the definition." 

Yet again the author puts word in Dr. Carson's mouth. Dr. Carson did not "compare homosexuality to pedophilia and bestiality," he quite correctly asserted that no group gets to change the definition of marriage to suit their predilections.)

There’s no such thing as a war crime

Carson also said earlier this year that the U.S. should not hesitate to send troops to defeat the Islamic State and should not fear prosecution for any of its actions abroad. In the Fox News interview, he suggested that the military should not be subject to any war crimes law.

“If you’re gonna have rules for war, you should just have a rule that says no war,” he said. “Other than that, we have to win.” (Sigh. The logic-challenged author yet again misrepresents Dr. Carson. Here's the quote: 

"Our military needs to know that they’re not gonna be prosecuted when they come back, because somebody has, said 'You did something that was politically incorrect.' There is no such thing as a politically correct war. We need to grow up, we need to mature. If you’re gonna have rules for war, you should just have a rule that says no war. Other than that, we have to win. Our life depends on it." 

Do you see anything in this post about war crimes? No? Dr. Carson's point is clear. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is the issue.)

Obama is depressing the economy to keep people on welfare

After appearing on The View last year and saying that Americans have become dependent on welfare, Carson elaborated on Fox News. “Do you think that people who are on welfare want to be on welfare?” Fox’s Megyn Kelly asked him.

“I think some people have that as a way of life,” Carson responded, later adding that “perhaps some of the things that are going on right now which could be easily remedied are not being remedied in order to keep the economy depressed because there would be no appetite for many of the social programs if people were doing well.” (Again? Really? I am now convinced that the author is malevolent. She is deliberately lying. In the linked video clip, Dr. Carson never said "Obama," Megyn Kelly did. Dr. Carson's response is quoted by the author, and there isn't even a hint that he thinks Obama is doing such a thing.)

Obama signed immigration reform to bring in government-dependent voters

After speaking out about welfare, Carson said in an interview months later that Obama’s executive action on immigration was part of a “nefarious agenda” to bring new voters into the United States who will be dependent on government.

“Is he just trying to instead of get out the vote, bring in the vote?” former Republican Rep. J.D. Hayworth asked Carson. “Is this all designed to have new voters — despite the fact he claims they’re not going to get citizenship — is the long-term goal to bring in a new class of voters dependent on government?”

“Of course it is,” Carson replied. (We are again left wondering what is "ridiculous" about these statements. Clearly one of the reasons for unregulated immigration is because of the voting tendencies of immigrants.)

Congress should be able to remove judges for voting for marriage equality

In an interview with a conservative radio host earlier this year, Carson said it was “unconstitutional” that judges have ruled in favor of equality despite statewide ballot initiatives that resulted in different outcomes. Carson said that when federal judges make rulings like this, “our Congress actually has the right to reprimand or remove them.” (Hardly "ridiculous." Judges do not have the constitutional power to unilaterally overturn duly-passed legislation, and such abuses of power should subject these judges to sanction.)

Anarchy could cancel the 2016 election

Carson warned in an interview in 2014 that if we “continue down this pathway that we are going down,” referring to “this pathway where everything is framed in a political sense and our representatives are not working for the people, they’re working for their party,” then the anarchy could lead to the 2016 election being called off. He claimed that the growing national debt, ISIS and the then-Democratic controlled U.S. Senate’s refusal to consider legislation passed by the Republican House of Representatives all pointed toward the idea that the country is headed toward anarchy.

If Carson’s prediction proved to be true, he said, Obama could declare martial law and the 2016 election would not occur. (Maybe not likely, but certainly a possibility. Hardly "ridiculous," considering the Left's propensity to riot, protest, and block polling places. They are happy to destroy people with whom they disagree, they show little reluctance to respect diverse opinions, they viciously attack people who step outside their orthodoxy. 

All of this contributes to an atmosphere of fear, hatred, and retribution. This climate they've created will eventually result in pushback from those they have oppressed, and the results could be violent.)